Rail and Transit Benefit, Highways Lose Out in TIGER Grant Distribution

Tucson_Streetcar.jpgThe Tucson Modern Streetcar was a TIGER winner (Photo: Tucson Regional Transit Authority)

One year after the stimulus bill was signed into law, the Department of Transportation unveiled the winners of its big TIGER grants, which are transportation projects awarded on merit to cities and transit agencies from around the country.

For proponents of new streetcar projects in cities like Cincinnati, Charlotte, and Atlanta, today’s announcement is a major let-down. Each had hoped to win but a small portion of the U.S. Department if Transportation’s $1.5 billion in discretionary funds for meritorious transportation projects.

Alas, applicants from all fifty states demanded a total of more than $56 billion in federal grants, and there simply is not enough money to spread around.

But the Department of Transportation is moving in a positive direction: only 23% of investment went to highway projects, compared to 26% for transit and much more for intermodal and freight rail. It also has invested big bucks in pedestrian improvement programs. Indeed, TIGER says a lot about how this DOT works when it’s not under the direct control of Congress: it is prioritizing spending that is not car-centric.

And some cities were lucky today, their proposals intriguing enough to attract the attention of Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood. Detroit now has a serious commitment from Washington for its Woodward Avenue light rail line; Dallas and Tucson will be able to move forward with their downtown transit links; New Orleans will be able to construct a minor extension of its streetcar network; New York City will see an expansion of service for its Midtown commuter rail lines; and the Washington, D.C. region will get the go-ahead for a number of rapid bus lines.

Philadelphia and Indianapolis will get significant sums to reinforce and renovate their pedestrian and bicycle networks.

But the Administration’s focus is clearly still on intercity rail, a priority for President Obama’s team since entering office more than a year ago. Three projects, each with a cost of $98 million or more, will address existing bottlenecks in the freight system, clearing the way for better transport of goods and more reliable passenger service. Corridors near Chicago, between Northwest Ohio and Pennsylvania, and in the deep South will see such improvements.

Though the TIGER grant process was supposed to result in the funding of creative, unique solutions to transportation problems in the United States, it would be hard to argue that many of the programs chosen for funding today are particularly different: no money was spent on bike share networks, for instance.

The DOT is also demonstrating a rather close consideration for the financial needs of the nation’s freight rail companies, which will be benefiting directly from Washington’s spending on improved rail corridors. It could be suggested that there are few other outlets at the national level to award such funds — and there are certainly significant merits to investing in the transportation of cargo via rail — but whether the government should be choosing to benefit certain freight rail companies over others is open to debate.

If the government is investing in improving traffic conditions along freight lines, shouldn’t it also receive some of the profits from the operations of those lines? Shouldn’t it demand from the companies that benefit better treatment for Amtrak, which is frequently delayed because of freight trains that share the same track?

There are also some transit investments here that appear to be mild forms of patronage for cities on the economic down-and-out. Why should Revere, Massachusetts or Normal, Illinois get tens of millions of dollars for their downtown transit facilities? Can the DOT provide compelling evidence for why their applications were more worthy than those of the tens of other cities that asked for similar funds for similar projects?

Meanwhile, the relatively small nature of most of the grants means that the impact of TIGER may be too spread out. New Orleans, for instance, will get money for just a tiny segment of its overall streetcar expansion project.

That said, Las Vegas and Tucson will get enough funds to ensure the completion of their full respective bus rapid transit and streetcar lines.

For those cities that did not receive awards today, their hopes shouldn’t yet be exhausted. The Department of Transportation has $280 million to distribute over the next year for inner-city circulator grants, money that will go to many of the bus rapid transit and streetcar systems that do not yet have enough fiscal support.

Major TIGER Transit Stimulus Projects (not including multimodal and port projects)
Place Project TIGER Grant ($m) Total Cost ($m) Description
Crescent Corridor Intermodal Freight Rail Project 105 224 Development of Norfolk Southern’s route from the Gulf Coast to the Mid-Atlantic
Chicago, IL CREATE 100 162 Effort to rework railways in the Chicago area, speed up freight and passenger services
National Gateway Freight Rail Corridor 98 183 Invests in upgrading CSX freight track between Northwest Ohio and Pennsylvania
New York City, NY Moynihan Station 83 267 Companion station for Penn Station; part of much larger multi-billion project to build a new terminal
Tucson, AZ Modern Streetcar 63 150.1 Rebuilding of 3.9-mile trolley line; expansion and upgrading to modern standards
Washington, DC Priority Buses 58.8 83 Improves bus service along 13 corridors
Boston, MA Fitchburg Commuter Rail Extension 55.5 72.2 Extends existing service 4.5 miles west
Kansas City, MO Transit Corridors/Green Impact Zone 50 62.4 Targets neighborhood improvement through investment in green infra
New Orleans, LA Union Passenger Terminal/Loyola Loop Streetcar 45 45 Line from Union Passenger Terminal to Canal Street
St. Paul, MN Union Depot 35 237.5 Renovation of the station, clearing of the area to become regional transit hub
Las Vegas, NV Sahara Avenue BRT 34.4 45.2 17-mile BRT line
Colton, CA Alameda Corridor East: Colton Crossing 33.8 198.3 Eliminates at-grade crossing between Union Pacific and BNSF Railways
Detroit, MI Woodward Light Rail 25 143 New rail line between Hart Plaza and New Center, partially funded by private sources
Portland, OR Innovation Quadrant 23.2 66.5 Reconstructs SW Moody, Prepares new streetcar tracks
Philadelphia, PA Regional Bike and Ped Network 23 54.8 Repairs 16.3 miles of ped and bike facilities
Dallas, TX Downtown Streetcar 23 58 Improves transit connections in the downtown area
Normal, IL Multimodal Transportation Center 22 47.4 Centralizes area’s transportation facilities
Indianapolis, IN Bike and Ped Network 20.5 62.5 Completes 8-mile network downtown
Revere, MA Transit Facility 20 122.6 Creates new multi-modal transit facility, revitalizes Wonderland area
Kent, OH Central Gateway Transit Facility 20 26.7 New bus transfer facility, along with parking spaces
New Bedford, MA Fast Track 20 71.4 Reconstructs a series of freight rail bridges, allows freight to waterfront area
Appalachian Region Short-Line Rail Project 17.6 21.9 Rehabilitation of hundreds of miles of short-line railroads
Denver, CO U.S. 36 Managed Lanes/BRT 10 160 BRT from Boulder to Denver, shared with HOT Lanes

Image above: Tucson Modern Streetcar, from Tucson Regional Transit Authority

Share/Bookmark