Matthew Yglesias at Slate comments on Seattle’s parking minumum reforms.
Legislation passed last week by the City of Seattle will expand the areas that will be exempt from parking minimums and reduce the minimums in further areas.
It is good news for parking reformers and Yglesias approves.
But he also points out how limited this really is:
The conceit is generally that cities should identify some particular swathes of land—downtown or downtown-adjacent, near frequent mass transit, whatever—where it seems like parking demand may be low, and then use those places as test cases for less planning. The real change in attitudes that we require is to recognize that there’s no need for parking minimums even where demand for parking is high.
In other words, why limit parking reform to dense, transit-rich places? Reform of parking minimums is just as important for automobile dependent locations! Good point.
Then Yglesias suggests an analogy.
Oooh I like analogies, as regular readers will know.