This, my friends, is a great example of how myopic reasoning by state departments of transportation can lead to horrible results at the community level.
Today, Ron Beitler at Strong Towns tells the story of East Texas, Pennsylvania, where residents and community leaders agreed to reduce the speed limit on Willow Lane/East Texas Road through the heart of a residential area. Because this is a state road, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation had to be involved.
PennDOT’s response to the request was, as Beitler explains, as infuriating as it was predictable:
Residents submitted a petition signed by nearly the entire neighborhood requesting a speed limit reduction since they felt the speed didn’t match up with the residential character of the Village of East Texas. The township supported the request. In fact they even identify East Texas as a traditional town center area. In other words all interested parties who actually understand the context of the road agree.
But based on one-size-fits-all engineering guidelines, Penndot’s answer is … wait for it …
To actually increase the design speed of the road!!!
Let that sink in. This my friends is insanity. PennDOT’s answer is increasing design speed by widening the street, flattening the street, removing all trees so cars can drive faster, THEN posting a speed limit so they slow down?
PennDOT completely ignores the context and character of the roadway with its one-size-fits-all application of the 85th percentile speed. It applies standards blindly as if every road was a connector street. [85% speed followup post.]
Here’s a look at that animated “Conversation with an Engineer,” which really does capture this situation perfectly: